Skip to content

Related projects

This is a research index for products adjacent to AuthProxy. Vendor packaging, self-hosting terms, and connector counts change frequently; verify the linked vendor sources before using the tables for a procurement decision.

The landscape splits into a few overlapping domains:

  • Unified APIs: Normalize a vertical (e.g., HRIS/ATS/Accounting) behind a single data model and endpoint set.
  • Embedded iPaaS: Integration infrastructure designed to be embedded into your SaaS product for customer-facing integrations.
  • Traditional iPaaS / Workflow Automation: Internal automation platforms with large connector catalogs and visual builders.
  • Webhook / Event Gateways: Reliability infrastructure for receiving, routing, observing, replaying, and delivering asynchronous events.
  • Zero-trust Access / Identity-aware Proxies: Resource-level access for humans and workloads, enforced from identity and request context rather than network location.
  • API, AI, and MCP Gateways: Traffic policy, model routing, or tool aggregation for APIs and agent infrastructure.
  • Open-source Frameworks / Building Blocks: Libraries or frameworks for teams that want full control.

Below are summaries and comparison tables for the projects in this repo’s list. Connector counts are taken from the vendors’ public catalogs or docs when available; when not available, it’s noted explicitly.

AuthProxy is a strong fit when a team wants to keep using native third-party APIs, run the credential data plane in infrastructure it controls, and reuse a connection lifecycle across many integrations. It provides embedded connection and administration UIs, but the host application keeps its own business logic and provider-specific requests.

That produces different tradeoffs from adjacent categories:

  • A unified API reduces provider differences but introduces a normalized data model. AuthProxy preserves the provider’s full native surface.
  • A managed embedded iPaaS can provide a larger maintained catalog and hosted operations. AuthProxy provides source access and deployment control, while the adopting team owns its connectors and environment.
  • A workflow automation system owns orchestration and transformations. AuthProxy focuses on connections, authentication, proxying, and governance; application code still owns the workflow.
  • A webhook or event gateway makes asynchronous event ingress or egress reliable with queues, retries, replay, routing, and delivery logs. AuthProxy manages credentials and authenticated synchronous API calls; it does not replace durable webhook delivery infrastructure.
  • An API or MCP traffic gateway applies authentication, authorization, rate limits, routing, and observability at a shared network boundary. AuthProxy instead owns each application’s tenant-facing connection setup, provider credential lifecycle, and authenticated native-API forwarding.
  • A zero-trust access platform or identity-aware proxy decides which human, workload, or agent can reach a protected resource, often across private networks and multiple protocols. AuthProxy decides which application actor owns and can use each third-party API connection; it is not a VPN, ZTNA, or general infrastructure-access product.
  • A secret manager or credential proxy protects secret access. AuthProxy adds OAuth callbacks and refresh, user-facing setup, connector versions, health, rate limits, and request-event context.

The relevant build-versus-buy question is therefore not only connector count. It is whether the team wants to own provider-specific integration behavior and its deployment in exchange for native API access, extensibility, and control of credential and request data.


Product Commercial / OSS Traditional vs Embedded Connector Count Self-hosting Notes
Merge Commercial Primarily embedded (customer-facing) 220+ integrations Yes (paid option; details not public) Unified APIs across HRIS, ATS, CRM, Accounting, Ticketing, etc.
Kombo Commercial Embedded 250+ integrations No public self-host option; regional SaaS (EU/US) Unified API focused on HRIS/ATS/LMS/Payroll.

Embedded iPaaS (customer-facing integrations)

Section titled “Embedded iPaaS (customer-facing integrations)”
Product Commercial / OSS Traditional vs Embedded Connector Count Self-hosting Notes
Paragon Commercial Embedded 130+ native connectors Yes (managed or unmanaged on-prem) Embedded SDK, white-labeled UI, auth, logs, multi-tenant.
Prismatic Commercial Embedded 190+ connectors Partial (on-prem agent for private resources) Low-code + code SDK, integration marketplace tooling.
Workato Commercial Traditional iPaaS w/ embedded option 1,000+ connectors Partial (on-prem agent for private systems) Enterprise automation platform; embedded option exists.
Tray.io Commercial Traditional + embedded offering Not publicly stated Partial (on-prem agent for private systems) Visual workflow builder + embedded product.
Cyclr Commercial Embedded 600+ applications Yes (self-hosted private cloud) Embedded integration platform and connector library.
Pandium Commercial Embedded 200+ connectors (docs mention 210) No public self-host option; managed infrastructure Code-first, connectors focus on auth + webhooks.
Ampersand Commercial + OSS connectors Embedded Not publicly stated No public self-host for platform; OSS connectors library Declarative, code-first integrations; open connectors repo.
Nango Commercial + OSS (Elastic License) Embedded / integration infrastructure 500-700+ APIs (varies by page) Yes (limited free self-host; enterprise self-host) Code-first integration platform with auth, sync, webhooks.
Frigg Open Source Embedded framework Not publicly stated Yes (runs in your cloud) OSS framework for building integrations in your own cloud.

Product Commercial / OSS Traditional vs Embedded Connector Count Self-hosting Notes
n8n Open source + commercial hosting Traditional iPaaS 1,000+ apps Yes (self-hosted editions) Visual workflow automation, self-hostable.
Pipedream Commercial (free tier) Traditional iPaaS "Thousands of apps" No (publicly stated no self-host option) Code-first workflows with triggers/actions and webhook support.
Workato Commercial Traditional iPaaS 1,000+ connectors Partial (on-prem agent for private systems) Enterprise automation, recipe-based workflows.
Tray.io Commercial Traditional iPaaS Not publicly stated Partial (on-prem agent for private systems) Visual workflow builder with strong API tooling.
Apache Camel Open Source (Apache-2.0) Integration framework; adjacent to traditional iPaaS via Camel K / Karavan 370 non-core components (plus core components and Kamelets) Yes (library/runtime you operate; Camel K runs on Kubernetes) Enterprise Integration Patterns, route DSLs, components, Kamelets, and low-code/Kubernetes tooling.

Webhook gateways are a distinct, narrower integration-infrastructure category. They sit between an event producer and one or more consumers, adding durable ingress or delivery, retries, rate control, routing, replay, signing, and operational visibility. Unlike an iPaaS, they generally do not provide a large catalog of authenticated API actions or own application workflows.

Product Direction Packaging / license Self-hosting Notes
Hookdeck Inbound and outbound Commercial Event Gateway; Apache-2.0 Outpost runtime Outbound: yes; inbound: no public self-host option Event Gateway receives, queues, filters, transforms, routes, observes, and replays external events. Outpost provides multi-tenant outbound webhooks and event destinations.
Svix Primarily outbound Commercial hosting + open-source server (MIT) Yes Webhooks-as-a-service focused on delivery, signing, retries, monitoring, and an application portal.
Convoy Inbound and outbound Commercial + source-available server (Elastic License 2.0) Yes Webhook gateway with routing, persistence, retries, rate limiting, circuit breaking, and an operator dashboard.
Hook0 Outbound Commercial hosting + source-available server (SSPL-1.0) Yes Multi-tenant webhook sending with subscriptions, signatures, retries, delivery logs, and replay.
  • Hookdeck spans both sides of the boundary. Its managed Event Gateway is an inbound proxy and asynchronous API gateway for accepting third-party events before they reach an application, with filtering, transformations, rate control, observability, and replay. Hookdeck Outpost handles outbound delivery to customer-managed webhooks, queues, brokers, and event buses. Outpost is Apache-2.0 and can be self-hosted; Hookdeck does not publish a self-hosted edition of the inbound Event Gateway. See: https://hookdeck.com/, https://hookdeck.com/docs, and https://github.com/hookdeck/outpost.
  • Svix is the closest permissively licensed outbound alternative. Its hosted service and MIT-licensed self-hosted server accept one publish call and handle endpoint management, signing, retries, and delivery observability. Svix’s consumer tooling also helps recipients verify and debug messages, but the core product is outbound delivery rather than a general inbound proxy. See: https://www.svix.com/ and https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks.
  • Convoy is a bidirectional, self-hostable gateway that can ingest provider webhooks and deliver application events to customer endpoints. Its repository is publicly available under Elastic License 2.0, which permits self-hosting but is source-available rather than OSI open source. See: https://github.com/frain-dev/convoy and https://www.getconvoy.io/core-gateway.
  • Hook0 focuses on providing outbound webhooks to a SaaS product’s users. It is self-hostable and publishes its server and UI source under SSPL-1.0; that license is source-available rather than an OSI-approved open-source license. See: https://www.hook0.com/ and https://github.com/hook0/hook0.

For AuthProxy, these systems are complementary more often than substitutes. A host application can use AuthProxy to manage a tenant’s authenticated calls to a provider and place a webhook gateway at its event boundary. The overlap is limited to adjacent concerns such as tenant isolation, request observability, and proxying; webhook gateways do not generally own OAuth connection setup, token refresh, or arbitrary authenticated access to a provider’s native API.


Zero-trust access and identity-aware proxies

Section titled “Zero-trust access and identity-aware proxies”

Zero trust is a security architecture rather than a precise product category. NIST SP 800-207 describes it in terms of protecting resources without granting implicit trust from network location or ownership. For this index, the category is intentionally narrower: platforms whose primary data plane authenticates human or workload identities and enforces policy when they access protected infrastructure, applications, or APIs.

Product Primary boundary Resource coverage Identity and upstream credentials Self-hosting Notes
Octelium Unified ZTNA and identity-aware proxy HTTP APIs, AI/MCP endpoints, SSH, Kubernetes, PostgreSQL/MySQL, DNS, TCP/UDP services, and managed containers Human and workload Users access Services with cluster-issued identity; Services can inject stored upstream credentials, including OAuth2 client-credentials tokens Yes (Apache-2.0 clients/APIs/SDK; AGPLv3 cluster; separate enterprise repository) Kubernetes-based; private WireGuard/QUIC and public clientless access; per-request L7-aware ABAC, dynamic routing, and access logs.
Teleport Infrastructure identity and access proxy Servers, databases, Kubernetes, cloud resources, applications, and MCP servers Short-lived human/workload identity; optional signed JWT to an MCP upstream Yes (AGPL-3.0 source; restricted Community binaries; commercial editions) RBAC/ABAC, JIT access, device trust, audit events, and session recording for enrolled resources.
  • Octelium: A self-hosted, single-tenant access platform built around a Kubernetes Cluster. An administrator defines an upstream resource as a Service; human or workload Users reach it through private WireGuard/QUIC or public clientless paths; the Vigil identity-aware proxy asks the Octovigil policy decision point to authorize each request. Application-aware modes add policy and audit context for HTTP, SSH, Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, MySQL, DNS, and other protocols. Its secretless HTTP mode injects basic, bearer, or custom-header credentials and can obtain OAuth2 client-credentials tokens. The documented model is administrator-provisioned Services, Secrets, Users, and Policies rather than a provider connector catalog or customer-facing OAuth connection flow. The repository describes the client tools, APIs, and Go SDK as Apache-2.0 and the cluster components as AGPLv3. Its Secrets documentation says the default Cluster stores Secret data in plaintext; operators can implement a custom storage integration through a gRPC interface, while managed encryption-at-rest integrations and the web console are commercial features. See: https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/overview/how-octelium-works, https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/management/core/service/secretless, https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/management/core/service/http, https://octelium.com/docs/octelium/latest/management/core/secret, and https://github.com/octelium/octelium.
  • Teleport: Infrastructure identity platform that treats MCP servers as protected resources alongside databases, Kubernetes clusters, applications, and other infrastructure. Teleport enrolls existing STDIO, SSE, or streamable-HTTP MCP servers, authenticates users and workloads, applies RBAC/ABAC and JIT access, and emits per-tool audit events and session recordings. It can pass Teleport-signed JWT identity to an upstream MCP server, but it does not create tools, translate REST APIs into MCP, or manage each end user’s third-party OAuth connection. MCP enrollment, proxying, identity controls, and per-tool audit are listed for Community and Enterprise editions. The repository source is AGPL-3.0, while distributed Community binaries use a commercial license with company-size and revenue restrictions. See: https://goteleport.com/platform/zero-trust-access/, https://goteleport.com/docs/enroll-resources/mcp-access/, and https://goteleport.com/docs/feature-matrix/.

Octelium has the strongest AuthProxy overlap in this category: both can keep HTTP credentials away from callers, inject them at a proxy, apply request-level policy, and preserve the upstream’s native API. The ownership model is the key difference. Octelium primarily governs which Users can reach an administrator-defined Service and is much broader across networks and protocols. AuthProxy primarily lets an application give each actor or tenant its own connection, including embedded OAuth2 authorization-code setup, refresh and revocation, connector-version lifecycle, and health management. The products can also be complementary: Octelium can govern workforce or infrastructure access around an AuthProxy deployment while AuthProxy owns the application’s tenant-facing provider connections.


“MCP gateway” is not one product category with a settled scope. Current products use the term for at least three different boundaries:

  • A protocol and traffic gateway fronts MCP servers, converts APIs into MCP tools, and applies authentication, access policy, rate limits, and telemetry. Kong follows this model.
  • A tool aggregation and execution gateway connects to MCP servers, controls which tools a model can discover or execute, and can expose the combined tools as another MCP server. Bifrost follows this model alongside its LLM gateway.
  • An identity-aware access proxy enrolls existing MCP servers and governs which humans or agents can reach them, with RBAC and audit trails. Teleport and Octelium follow this model and are covered in the zero-trust access section above.

These are worth tracking because they can sit next to AuthProxy in an agent architecture, and some are beginning to overlap with credential lifecycle. They do not all provide customer-facing API integrations.

Product Primary gateway role API / tool coverage Credential model Self-hosting Notes
Composio Agent tool integration 900-1000+ toolkits (500+ apps) Managed application auth Not stated in docs Managed auth, triggers, tools, and MCP servers.
Metorial MCP integration platform 600+ MCP servers Managed integration auth Yes (open source; self-hostable) MCP server catalog, deployment, and observability.
Pica Auth and tool-action gateway 200+ integrations Managed AuthKit connections No public self-host option AuthKit plus a passthrough API with 25k+ actions.
Airweave Agent data-ingestion gateway 50+ data sources Source connection credentials Yes (open source; self-host or hosted) Unified retrieval layer for agents.
LiteLLM LLM inference gateway 100+ model providers Centrally managed provider credentials Yes (OSS self-host; cloud option) Model routing, auth, quotas, and spend controls; not an MCP tool gateway.
Bifrost LLM inference + MCP tool gateway 20+ model providers; arbitrary MCP servers Provider keys; shared or per-user MCP OAuth Yes (open source; Apache-2.0) Acts as an MCP client and server, filters tools, and gates execution or autonomous agent mode.
Kong API, AI, and MCP traffic gateway User-managed APIs and MCP servers Gateway auth; OAuth or credential pass-through for MCP Yes (Apache-2.0 core; commercial editions) Proxies APIs and MCP servers, converts REST operations into tools, aggregates tools, and applies traffic policy. MCP proxy features require AI Gateway Enterprise.
Agent Vault Credential proxy for AI agents Any HTTPS service (no connector catalog) User-registered credentials injected at the network layer Yes (open source; MIT) Keeps credentials out of agent processes and constrains network access.
  • Composio: Managed auth and tool execution for AI agents. Docs mention 1000+ toolkits; the toolkits catalog shows ~900 toolkits; other pages reference 500+ apps. No self-host option is documented. See: https://docs.composio.dev/, https://docs.composio.dev/toolkits, and https://docs.composio.dev/toolkits/introduction.
  • Metorial: Open-source MCP integration platform; GitHub repo states it is open source and self-hostable, with a hosted option available. See: https://github.com/metorial/metorial.
  • Pica: Integration infrastructure for SaaS + AI; AuthKit handles OAuth/token refresh and multi-tenant auth. Docs require a Pica account and API key, implying hosted service. See: https://docs.picaos.com/authkit/setup and https://docs.picaos.com/authkit.
  • Airweave: Open-source context retrieval layer with 50+ prebuilt connectors; focuses on ingestion and unified search for agents. Site FAQ says it is open source and can be self-hosted or used via hosted platform. See: https://airweave.ai/ and https://docs.airweave.ai/.
  • LiteLLM: Open-source LLM gateway supporting 100+ provider integrations, with spend tracking and routing. OSS page highlights self-hosting with no data sent to LiteLLM servers; docs show running the proxy via Docker or CLI. See: https://www.litellm.ai/oss and https://docs.litellm.ai/.
  • Bifrost: Apache-2.0 AI gateway with OpenAI-compatible APIs and routing across 20+ model providers. Its MCP subsystem connects to STDIO, HTTP, or SSE servers, exposes aggregated tools through an MCP Gateway URL, filters tools per request, client, or virtual key, and separates tool suggestions from explicit execution by default. It also supports shared OAuth with automatic refresh and per-user OAuth for upstream MCP servers. This overlaps AuthProxy’s token lifecycle for MCP-native integrations, but Bifrost is centered on model requests and MCP tool execution rather than embedded setup for arbitrary native APIs. See: https://github.com/maximhq/bifrost, https://docs.getbifrost.ai/mcp/overview, and https://docs.getbifrost.ai/mcp/connecting-to-servers.
  • Kong: General-purpose API gateway available as an Apache-2.0 core, commercial self-managed editions, and the Konnect managed control plane. Kong centralizes routing and plugins for authentication, authorization, rate limiting, transformations, and observability across APIs. Its enterprise AI MCP Proxy can front existing MCP servers, convert OpenAPI-described REST operations into MCP tools, aggregate tool sets, and apply per-tool ACLs and standard Kong policies. This is a traffic and protocol control plane, not a tenant connection lifecycle: upstream APIs, MCP servers, identities, and credentials must still be provisioned. See: https://github.com/Kong/kong, https://developer.konghq.com/mcp/, and https://developer.konghq.com/plugins/ai-mcp-proxy/.
  • Agent Vault: Open-source HTTP credential proxy by Infisical, purpose-built for AI agents. Agents get a scoped session and a local HTTPS_PROXY; Agent Vault injects the credential at the network layer so credentials are never returned to the agent. Works with any HTTP-speaking agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, custom Python/TypeScript, sandboxed processes) and any HTTPS API — there is no prebuilt connector catalog; you register your own services and credentials. Ships as a binary, Docker image, or from source; MIT-licensed with a separate ee/ directory for enterprise features. Offers a container-sandbox mode (iptables-locked egress through the proxy) and an SDK for orchestrating sandboxed agents (Docker/Daytona/E2B). See: https://github.com/Infisical/agent-vault, https://docs.agent-vault.dev, and https://infisical.com/blog/agent-vault-the-open-source-credential-proxy-and-vault-for-agents.

For AuthProxy, the most direct MCP-gateway overlap is Bifrost’s per-user OAuth and token refresh for upstream MCP servers. Kong overlaps at the authenticated proxy and policy layer. The zero-trust access platforms above overlap in identity, authorization, and audit. AuthProxy remains distinct when the product needs an embeddable connection UI, versioned connector definitions, health and lifecycle management, and unrestricted forwarding to each provider’s native API. An MCP gateway could consume tools backed by AuthProxy connections, or AuthProxy could sit behind a gateway or access platform when broader traffic or infrastructure policy is required.


Project Commercial / OSS Traditional vs Embedded Connector Count Self-hosting Notes
Frigg Open Source Embedded framework Not publicly stated Yes (runs in your cloud) Serverless framework + API modules library.
Ampersand Connectors Open Source Embedded building blocks Not publicly stated Yes (library you run yourself) OSS connector library used by Ampersand.
Hookdeck Outpost Open Source (Apache-2.0) Outbound event-delivery infrastructure N/A (destination types, not API connectors) Yes Multi-tenant webhooks and event destinations with retries, fan-out, observability, and a user portal.
Svix Webhooks Open Source (MIT) Outbound webhook-delivery infrastructure N/A (webhook endpoints, not API connectors) Yes Self-hostable webhook sending server with retries, signatures, and delivery controls.
Apache Camel Open Source (Apache-2.0) Integration framework / building block 370 non-core components (plus core components and Kamelets) Yes (library/runtime you operate) EIP-based routing and mediation framework with route DSLs, components, data formats, Camel K, and Karavan.
  • Frigg: OSS framework for teams that want to own infrastructure and build embedded integrations; provides a modular API library and serverless architecture, and runs in your cloud. See: https://lefthook.com/frigg/ and https://docs.friggframework.org/.
  • Ampersand Connectors: OSS connector library used by Ampersand; useful for teams building their own integration infrastructure. See: https://github.com/amp-labs/connectors.
  • Hookdeck Outpost: Apache-2.0 outbound event-delivery runtime. It supports multi-tenant webhooks plus destinations such as SQS, Kafka, RabbitMQ, EventBridge, and Pub/Sub, and includes retries, fan-out, OpenTelemetry, and an end-user portal. See: https://github.com/hookdeck/outpost.
  • Svix Webhooks: MIT-licensed server behind Svix’s outbound webhook service. It is the other permissively licensed, self-hostable alternative in this comparison. See: https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks.
  • Apache Camel: OSS integration building block for teams that want full control over routes, transports, and deployment. It is strongest when the problem is message routing, mediation, protocol bridging, transformation, or running integration logic inside Java/Spring Boot/Quarkus/Kubernetes environments. It is less directly comparable to embedded iPaaS products because it does not provide a hosted multi-tenant connection UI, unified API model, or credential lifecycle out of the box. See: https://camel.apache.org/manual/faq/what-is-camel.html and https://camel.apache.org/docs/.

Product Primary Use Case Code vs UI Eventing/Webhooks Connector Definition Self-hosting
AuthProxy Embedded connection lifecycle and authenticating proxy Code-first with embedded Marketplace and Admin UIs Not a workflow or event platform Declarative, versioned definitions maintained by the adopting team Yes
Merge Unified API for B2B SaaS data API-first (code) Webhooks supported Vendor-defined connectors maintained by Merge Yes (paid option)
Kombo Unified HR/ATS/LMS/Payroll API-first (code) Webhooks supported Vendor-defined connectors maintained by Kombo No public self-host option
Paragon Embedded integrations for SaaS Hybrid (SDK + UI) Webhooks + workflow triggers Prebuilt + custom connector builder Yes (managed or unmanaged on-prem)
Prismatic Embedded iPaaS Hybrid Webhooks + workflows Prebuilt + SDK Partial (on-prem agent)
Workato Traditional enterprise iPaaS UI-heavy Triggers + actions Prebuilt + custom connectors Partial (on-prem agent)
Tray.io Traditional + embedded iPaaS UI-heavy Triggers + actions Prebuilt + custom connector SDK Partial (on-prem agent)
Cyclr Embedded iPaaS UI-heavy Triggers + actions Prebuilt + custom connector tools Yes (self-hosted private cloud)
Pandium Embedded iPaaS (code-first) Code-first Webhooks supported Auth-focused connectors + code integrations No public self-host option
Ampersand Embedded iPaaS (code-first) Code-first Subscribe to events Declarative YAML + OSS connectors No public self-host option (platform)
Nango Integration infrastructure Code-first Webhooks + syncs Prebuilt auth + custom integrations Yes (limited free self-host; enterprise self-host)
n8n Workflow automation UI-heavy + code nodes Webhooks + triggers Community + core nodes Yes (self-hosted editions)
Pipedream Workflow automation Code-first + UI Webhooks + triggers App actions + custom code No (publicly stated)
Hookdeck Inbound event gateway + outbound delivery Hybrid (API + UI + CLI) Core product Sources, routing connections, destinations, and delivery policies Outbound Outpost only (Apache-2.0)
Svix Outbound webhook delivery API-first + application portal Core product Applications, endpoints, event types, and delivery policies Yes (MIT server)
Convoy Bidirectional webhook gateway API + operator UI Core product Sources, subscriptions, endpoints, and delivery policies Yes (Elastic License 2.0)
Hook0 Outbound webhook delivery API + UI Core product Applications, event types, subscriptions, and endpoints Yes (SSPL-1.0)
Octelium Zero-trust access and identity-aware proxy Declarative config + CLI; enterprise web console Access logs and protocol-aware auditing Services, Users, Secrets, and Policies; no provider connector catalog Yes (Apache-2.0 clients/APIs/SDK; AGPLv3 cluster)
Teleport Identity-aware infrastructure and MCP access CLI/config + management UI Proxies and audits MCP tool access Enrolled MCP servers and infrastructure resources Yes (AGPL-3.0 source; restricted Community binaries; commercial editions)
Composio AI agent tool access Code-first Triggers supported Toolkits + MCP servers Not stated in docs
Metorial MCP integration platform Code-first N/A (agent tool calls) MCP servers (hosted or OSS) Yes (open source; self-hostable)
Pica Auth + actions for AI & SaaS Code-first + embeddable UI Webhooks supported AuthKit + Passthrough API No public self-host option
Airweave Agent data ingestion Code-first Sync + retrieval Connectors for data sources Yes (open source; self-host or hosted)
LiteLLM LLM gateway Code-first N/A Provider integrations Yes (OSS self-host; cloud option)
Bifrost LLM and MCP tool gateway Code-first + management UI MCP client/server and tool execution Model providers + upstream MCP servers Yes (Apache-2.0)
Kong API, AI, and MCP traffic gateway API/declarative config + management UI Proxies, converts, and aggregates MCP tools User-managed APIs, services, and MCP servers Yes (Apache-2.0 core; MCP proxy is Enterprise)
Agent Vault Credential brokerage for AI agents Code-first (CLI + SDK) N/A (network-layer proxy) User-registered services + credentials; no prebuilt connectors Yes (OSS MIT; binary or Docker)
Apache Camel Routing, mediation, and protocol integration framework Code-first DSLs + Karavan low-code tooling Routes, timers, polling, messaging components, Kamelets Components, route DSLs, Kamelets Yes (OSS library/runtime; Camel K on Kubernetes)